in

Inky fingers - Josh Brooks writes on print

April 2008 - Posts

  • Printers, be proud!

    Flicking through this week’s PrintWeek, it struck me that despite our industry struggling in some areas, there is such a lot for us to be proud of.

    Take Wapping, where I was lucky enough to spend last Saturday night watching the last-ever print run. It was, as Adam Hooker writes in today’s magazine, an emotional evening. But the story of Wapping, and in particular the recent investment by News International in its brand new print plants, reminds us that printing in the UK is an enormously important industry. For those readers in smaller companies or who are feeling the daily grind getting to them, it’s not a bad thing to remember that they are part of something special.

    Equally, Helen Morris’s story on page 4 of today’s magazine highlights supermarket giant Asda’s decision to launch a big new catalogue. Anyone who thought the internet would dominate home shopping by 2008 was clearly wrong; on the contrary, the big supermarkets are falling over themselves to put ink on paper.

    Then there’s Vinalith, the firm in Kent which has produced a wonderful 3D front cover for the film magazine Empire. We’ve seen an advance copy and it really is something special. And, as far as we know, it’s a world first, which is even better.

    Finally, congratulations are due to Leach Colour and the Pureprint Group, who have both received Queens Awards for Enterprise. A few printers and suppliers are named in this every year, but it’s a great fillip to the industry to know that print is not invisible to the outside world.

    So in spite of the industry’s occasional difficulties, don’t despair – remember that we’re all part of something exciting and there really is a lot to celebrate.

     

  • In praise of… Gutenberg and Stephen Fry

    Print doesn’t often get the public recognition it deserves (except, of course, in PrintWeek). But Stephen Fry’s passionate documentary on Gutenberg’s press on Monday night brought some of that recognition, and was a great reminder of why what we do is so important.

     

    In the documentary, Fry told the story – at least, as far as we know it – if how Johannes Gutenberg came to develop the moveable type press that made him famous. Many of us will know the story already of Gutenberg’s formative years in the bankrupt city of Mainz, before he moved to Strasbourg and found finance to develop his big idea of the press. Not least, the sad outcome that Gutenberg lost his invention to his financier and ended up being supported through his old age by the citizens of Mainz (if my memory serves).

     

    But most remarkable about the documentary was Fry’s delight and real excitement at discovering how printing came about, and its importance to the world we live in. He describes printing as the most important invention since the wheel and the very bedrock of our society. And he’s right. Print has changed the world in the last half century and has led to the Renaissance, democracy and education – far beyond the wildest imaginings of Gutenberg’s venture, I’m sure.

     

    Here’s the link to BBC’s iPlayer where you can still watch the programme, although only for a couple more days. If you missed Monday, watch this before it’s too late.

     

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/page/item/b009wynj.shtml?filter=txdate%3A14-04&filter=txslot%3Aevening&start=1&scope=iplayerlast7days&version_pid=b009z5vp

     

  • E-paper on video

    Epaper has been seen by some as the biggest threat to print since the internet was launched (although, to be honest, that hasn't turned out to be much of a threat at all). As discussed in today's PrintWeek (17 April 2008), the world's biggest publishers are moving to releasing titles in ebook format at the same time as the printed edition, while newspaper publishers are also exploring the possibilities of the medium.

    News agency Reuters has posted a short video on epaper - follow the link here to watch it.

    http://uk.reuters.com/news/video?rpc=401&videoId=80497&feedType=VideoRSS&feedName=Environment&rpc=401

  • Fleet Street - but not so shameful

    I only came into the print industry four years ago and it is one of my great regrets that I will never have seen or heard the great clatter and commotion of newspaper printing on Fleet Street.

     

    So I was delighted last week to spend a couple of hours with a contact in the newspaper business who had worked in the Street of Shame – albeit briefly – in the last days before the newspaper industry decamped to Docklands.

     

    I want to share just one of the stories the newspaperman told me. Albeit second hand, it gives an idea of the eccentricity of Fleet Street in its glory days, and why Rupert Murdoch and the other press barons were so exasperated with it.

     

    It goes something like this. On weekend shifts, the printers would be paid in cash at the end of the shifts by a clerk from the newspaper’s accounts department, who would himself have had to come into the office early on a Sunday morning to hand out the little brown envelopes in an upstairs room.

     

    One day in the early 1980’s, a young clerk was handing out the wages and ticking off names on the register. One worker, arriving at the front of the queue, said he was picking up the pay for himself and other worker, Willie Croxson.

     

    “You can’t,” said the young clerk, on his first weekend shift.

     

    “Why not? I always pick up Willie’s pay,” retorted the printer.

     

    “Maybe you do, but he’ll have to come up and pick it up himself.”

     

    “Pick it up himself? You must be joking.”

     

    “What do you mean?”

     

    “Well, he can’t climb the stairs to get up here,” said the printer.

     

    “What?”

     

    “Yeah. He’s 78.”

     

    It turns out that in the glory days of Fleet Street, as well as the printers who would produce the papers, a group of old boys (they were surely invariably old boys at that time) would come in and sit around in the print works for a few hours just to pick up the pay check.

     

    Of course, it would never be tolerated today, in this age where accountants rule the world. But who cares? Working in Fleet Street sounds like a blast.

  • Will printers come together for the government?

    Public sector tendering has a somewhat mixed reputation in the industry. On one hand, it provides work and, depending on the framework or contract in question, kudos for those who are selected. But by all accounts the process can be a nightmare, with hugely complex pre-qualification questionnaires and demands for documents or mission statements that are relevant to no-one but the biggest companies.

    This week's launch of a tender process for the Department for Children, Scheels and Families therefore obviously caught my eye. The department is, as we report today, looking for a consortium of printers, or a single big printer, or a print management company, to provide a full range of print for the next eight years. The department spends around £17m on print every year already - this could go up or down during the life of the contract.

    None of this makes life easy for the SME printer. Few would be big enough themselves to get involved in a consortium with the scale to challenge for a tender like this. SMEs may get some work through print management companies, should one of them win this tender. But I suspect that this will be another tender process which excludes the little guy.

    That said, the DCSF's thinking is logical - as a department, it wants a single access point to its print supplier, which through streamlining the procurement process will reduce costs and, presumably, increase speed of turnaround. It's interesting to note that this single point of contact is exactly what many of the big print groups, such as Adare and St Ives, have been working hard to create over the last couple of years. This is obviously what the big clients want.

    It's surprising, too, that the DCSF has opted not to use the pan-government print framework that was set up last year, with some fanfare, by the Office of Government Commerce. The reason given was that the DCSF felt the OGC's framework didn't provide the necessary scope of services. This may be true, but I wonder if the point about the single contact point for the client was a more important factor.

    I find it hard to imagine this work going to anyone other than a print management company, and one of the big ones at that. That's not necessarily a bad thing (although I know there are some pretty strong view points for and against in the industry). In these cut-throat times, it's hard to see a real consortium of printers coming together to bid for this work. But, as always, I'm prepared to be proved wrong. And if a group of independent print firms got together and won this contract, it would be a great positive news story for the industry.