Proposed changes to legislation surrounding temporary staff would be a disaster for the print industry if they are introduced. Temporary staff play a vital role in our industry and the UK economy as a whole. The latest legislation, if passed will end the flexibility and, as such threaten the entire system of temporary employment.
A common misconception is that agency staff are a cheap solution. Companies that use them are paying not only the staff but the agency on top, sometimes the agency fees are equal to the fees the staff are being paid. The requirement for equal pay to regular staff after 12 weeks will make employment of temps after this period economically unfeasible for most companies.
In addition, the flexibility allowed by temporary contracts is a mutually beneficial two way agreement, companies can hire staff on short-term contracts and staff can leave at short notice. Temporary staff enable a company to fill a gap in its workforce on a short to medium term, recruiting extra staff for a busy period or covering a maternity leave.
Removing this flexibility will kill the vibrant market for temporary staff overnight. Naturally any abuse of agency staff must be stopped but is such abuse really so endemic as to justify this threat to the entire system?
Permanent staff rightly receive extra benefits to temporary staff. After all, they have invested time and energy in the company, they are more loyal in that they have made a commitment to that company and should be rewarded as such.
The direct mail and finishing industries are amongst the most exposed sectors to seasonal fluctuations of demand and, as such rely the most on temporary and flexible employment contracts and stand to lose the most if temporary employment is rendered prohibitively expensive.
Margins are stretched and every penny counts. The introduction of the proposed legislation will mean that companies simply do not employ temporary staff to fill the gaps instead imposing additional work loads on existing staff.
In modern day economies flexible employment is a key driver of growth. Of the Western European countries, those with the most inflexible employment laws are those that consistently deliver the weakest GDP growth in otherwise benign economic conditions. France grew by only 1.8% in 2007, Italy by 1.9%, compared to the UK’s 2.9%.
The UK stands on the brink of recession and it will need flexibility of its workforce more than ever in the coming two years. It is difficult to see exactly who this move will benefit. The economy needs a flexible workforce as temporary staff need work to pay the bills.