in

Press Minding - All the news that’s fit for print

Have we really reached the 'iPod moment for newspapers?'


Guardian columnist Jeff Jarvis caused quite a stir with his "iPod moment" for newspapers, with reaction rippling across the blogoscape – see here and here for a few examples.

 

What moment? For music it was when the iPod steamrollered through the music industry making downloading the norm and buying a physical disc just a nice thing to do, sometimes. Video iPods put the gadget on course to displace TV – yeah right – and now the Jobs wagon train has lined up newspapers.

 

Quoting Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams' note that "When you have a web browser in your pocket, a printed newspaper is redundant," Jarvis looks to the latest iPod's WiFi ability to browse the web as literally the killer app for print.

 

He bemoans the newspaper industry's inability to reinvent itself in any other form that replicating the format digitally.

 

Adams reckons printed newspapers will be looking over the cliff of extinction "in the time it takes for most people to upgrade their cell phones two more times".

 

But, he concedes, "Most people prefer to read a printed page versus a computer screen".

 

And there's the rub. If there was one form of print destined to destitution, it should be printed news. The phrase "today's news is tomorrow's chip paper" has always been true. But people still buy "the papers".

 

And while online audiences for news have rocketed, print circulations have declined relatively little. The FT actually grew its print circulation in September, and the explosion in free sheets such as The Metro has been well-recorded.

 

Which I guess boils down to this: where people perceive lasting value in information, they want it in print.

 

If you don’t believe me, you should have tried getting hold of a copy of Gazzetta dello Sport last year when Italy took the World Cup last year.

 

And if you're still sceptical, don't take my word for it. Try The Friday Project, which has the sales and distribution muscle of Pan Macmillan and is tasked with turning successful blogs into books.  Or blooks, as on-demand publisher LuLu calls them. And yes, they are successful. So much so that popular authors can win the Blooker Prize.

 

And you know what? The newspaper industry has been innovative in adding this value. Just look at the way the likes of Johnston Press over here and the Chicago Tribune in the US have jumped on 'hyperlocal' – the greater relevance of postcode local news to its audience, with hyperlocal websites engendering printed versions.

 

Just look at MAN Roland and Kodak introducing VDP into newspaper presses, so that newspapers can be personalised at full press speed. Can your iPod do that?

Comments

 

will pollard said:

Do you actually look at ABC numbers for UK newspaper circulation?

I read the Guardian media pages quite often and there seems to be a clear trend.

Jeff Jarvis now refers to "News Organisations" to describe what were newspapers and now publish through both print and online and maybe make a few videos.

By the way there is a suitably impressive print machine photographed at the toip of his blog - www.buzzmachine.com - so at least he started in the right place.

November 20, 2007 4:53 PM
 

will pollard said:

This may be off topic but has anyone spoken to Lawrence Walllis and explained this blogging thing? There could be a new stepchange in convergance and integration, expressed in language most people could understand.

November 20, 2007 4:58 PM
 

Matt Whipp said:

Regarding your first point, I look at ABCs regularly. My point is that I remain astounded that they are so high. We have a new generation growing up that get all their news from the Internet, and an ageing generation that, fresh into retirement, finds it has time to discover things like the Internet. That demographic heartland of people that have grown up with and still buy and read newspapers is going to be cut away at both top and bottom and I predict for paid-for newspapers it won't be a long drawn out expiration.

November 29, 2007 1:41 PM

About Matt Whipp

Editor, printweek.com,