in

Unite Viewpoint

November 2008 - Posts

  • G20 Crisis Summit - A Trade Union Declaration

    Worthwhile reading... A Trade Union Statement To the G20 Crisis Summit in Washington - The Washington Declaration. http://casinocrash.org/?p=506
  • Job losses, Proskills Awards and UTV.

    More job losses again this week across the board - in manufacturing, services, finance, everywhere are the recession bites. In the Unite GPM sector besides the big job losses announced in the papermaking sector in Scotland last month we are facing job more losses in commercial print notably this week at Cooper Clegg. Regional officers are reporting that some companies are just going bust because banks will not help them through short term cash flow problems. We have now set up a "recession database" to log job losses, closures. In the GPM sector, regional officers of the union have been sent survey forms to notify us of proposed job losses in the sector in advance and to help us campaign and lobby the government to help those facing unemployment, help families who are being hammered by the recession. Interestingly at the at the Proskills Apprentice Awards this week the word was those companies that do train and invest in their workforces are better placed to survive the recession - and once again it was highligted by the CEO of Proskills the lack of take up of training funds in some sectors of Proskills by employers. Proskills covers Print, Paper, Extractives, Coatings, Quarries, Furniture and Glass. Unite proudly sponsored The Young Achiever of The Year Award - which gets us welcome and positive publicity and it was interesting to talk to a wide range of training professionals, the apprentices and nominees and managers about training. Bernard Rutter the union's Sector Skills Co-ordinator was on hand to present the award. Disappointly the print apprentices nominated failed to win Aprrentice and Advanced Apprentice of the Year Awards, but they did well to win "highly commended" certificates. Maybe next year! Finally the latest Episode of Unite TV is now available at http://www.amicustheunion.org/default.aspx?page=9606
  • Unite GPM Sector e-bulletin 28 now available

    Latest Unite GPM Sector e-bulletin http://newsweaver.co.uk/unite/index000315353.cfm?x=bdGRJf2,bbdnCvmM
  • Obama - it was the unions what won it.

    Sorry to paraphrase the Sun from a few years back, but here is something to think about... President-elect Obama's "broad church", appealing to a coalition of working families, women, ethnic minorities, young people, union members and the beleaguered middle classes along with the fallout from the financial crisis is credited with his historic victory. However, data from polling in the US presidential election shows just how big an influence US unions had on the result and turnout. According to AFL-CIO research union voters supported President-elect Obama 67% to 30% over John McCain. In the main battleground states the difference was even more stark, with union members going for Obama 69% to 28% - a massive 41 point margin. While McCain won among voters aged 65 and over, active and retired union members aged 65 and over went for Obama by a 46-point margin. And while McCain won among armed forces veterans, veterans who were union members went for Obama by a 25 point margin. Members of the AFL-CIO and community umbrella organisation, 'Working America' who concentrated on the key marginal states, supported Obama by 67% to 30 % and 60% of union members and 56% of 'Working America' members said the economy was a "top issue". Statistics also show that union members received substantial contact from their unions during the election, with more than 80% receiving union mail, more than 80% receiving union publications, 59% getting live phone calls and 32% getting worksite flyers. In Midwestern states, where unions are at their strongest, and where George W. Bush had previously come close to winning and McCain campaigned hard, union support helped put votes solidly in Obama’s column. Obama won by 13 points in Wisconsin; 16 points in Michigan; 10 points in Minnesota and 11 points in Pennsylvania as well as helping win swing states such as Ohio, North Carolina, Michigan and Florida.   According to the AFL-CIO more than 250,000 union volunteers devoted their time and energy to working for an Obama victory and getting out the vote. This included some 10 million door knocks, 70 million phone calls, 27 million worksite flyers and 57 million union mail pieces made the difference in races from the White House to state legislatures.   The AFL-CIO says that 75% of union members say Obama’s victory gives him a mandate to make major change and 81% support the Employee Free Choice Act, which would give US unions the right to secure union recognition based on a membership card check. The Employee Free Choice Act, which would require employers to recognise unions once a majority of workers sign cards of support, is being fiercely opposed by big business. The current NLRB system is widely discredited and open to widespread abuse by employers and union busters. The battle over the EFC Act will be an early test of Obama's presidency. Obama strongly endorsed the legislation, saying it was an overdue effort to raise the standard of living for the nation's working class. But business leaders are already stepping up their campaign against the change in legislation, arguing that it would put "new burdens on business". We seem to have heard that somewhere before! US big business also opposes a provision that would allow a mediator to impose a contract settlement in cases where a union and management cannot agree on a deal within 120 days - a provision business leaders say will benefit unions. US union leaders will also push Obama to move quickly to stimulate the US economy by extending unemployment benefits, broadening the food stamp programme, investing in infrastructure, and making grants to state and local governments, which have been hard hit by revenue losses from the economic downturn. They are also looking to broaden the availability of healthcare and eventually increase taxes for top income earners as a way of countering the income inequality that has accelerated in the past decade. Which ever way you look at it, much of President-elect Obama's success was down to the support and sheer hard graft put in by US unions and their members.
  • Unite research shows drop in HSE injury investigation levels

    New research published by Unite, shows investigation levels into major injuries to workers have declined by 43 per cent between 2001/2 and 2006/7. In 2006/7, the last year when statistics are available, only 10.5 per cent of major injuries reported to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) were investigated. The research, undertaken by the Centre for Corporate Accountability for Unite, also shows that in the same five year period there has been a 69 per cent reduction in the number of worker 'over-three day' injuries investigated, a 31 per cent decline in the number of 'dangerous occurrences' investigated, and a 68 per cent decline in the number of members of the public injuries investigated. The issue of investigation levels - the central concern of the report - is crucial, because unless the HSE investigates an incident, it cannot know whether the injury or dangerous occurrence was caused by a health and safety failure. Therefore, a decision not to investigate can result in failures both in relation to prevention and in securing criminal accountability. Derek Simpson, Unite joint general secretary, said: "This report highlights the need for the government to address the problem accordingly and admit that the HSE needs more money, more resources, and more inspectors. We believe the most fundamental right for workers is that they return home from work to their families, healthy and safe. "The significant reductions in the level of investigations and prosecutions together with less HSE inspectors, goes to the heart of the question of levels of adequate HSE resources. "Unite activists are bearing the strain caused by such low levels of operating inspectors, and they are continually expected to police their own workplaces. However, they are doing a great job, reducing accident rates by half compared to non-unionised workplaces. Unite will continue the campaign to secure new and improved legal rights for safety reps." The research shows that there were significant variations in investigation levels between sectors. In 2006/7 the level of investigation ranged from 24.5 per cent in the agricultural sector to 5.3 per cent in the services sector. In the construction sector, the sector with the most number of reported deaths, only 14.1 per cent of major injuries were investigated, a reduction from 20 per cent six years earlier There was also significant variation in different regions. In 2006/7, the level of investigation ranged from 14 per cent in Scotland to 5.3 per cent in London. A full copy of the Unite report can be downloaded from the Unite website, visit: http://www.amicustheunion.org/Default.aspx?page=9530 Employers and others have an obligation under the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences 1995 (RIDDOR 95) to report certain kinds of injuries and incidents either to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) or to local authorities. The analysis in the Unite report only relates to those incidents reported to the HSE - that is to say injuries and dangerous occurrences relating to the construction, manufacturing, agricultural, energy and mining sectors - as well as a certain segment of service sector injuries. The injuries reported to the HSE in fact only represent a proportion of the total number of injuries that actually take place. The HSE acknowledge that 'non-fatal injuries are substantially under-reported,' estimating that 'just under half of all such injuries to employees are actually reported, with the self-employed reporting a much smaller proportion'. The most recent research suggests that 41 per cent of major injuries and 25 per cent of over three day injuries are reported. There is no data on the level of under-reporting of dangerous occurrences and injuries to members of the public. Both are likely to be significantly under-reported, for details visit: www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr528.pdf This under-reporting needs to be kept in mind since it means that the percentage of actual major injuries investigated is around 40 per cent of the level set out in this report (so, rather than 10.5 per cent of major injuries to workers being investigated, only about 4 per cent are actually investigated) and the level of over-three day injuries is 25 per cent of the level set out in this report (so rather than 2 per cent, it would be about 0.5 per cent).