Whilst I think business improvement techniques such as Six Sigma, TQM and 'Lean' etc. can be very helpful to some businesses \(when we are not overwhelmed with the credit crunch and recession), I do think it is regrettable that Proskills and other Sector Skills Councils have decided to start selling training programmes to employers, competing in an already mature and somewhat crowded market led by many excellent providers such as Cranfield, the Manufacturing Advisory Service, universities and others.
The Sector Skills Councils were set up by government to be 'led by employers' in order to achieve a 'step change' in training in their sectors. Unfortunately, as has happened so often in the past, they can end up selling government funded services to the employers and we end up with 'tail wagging dog' situation.
In fact, supposedly objective advice gets skewed towards what the quango or funded body can deliver \(and can obtain funding for), irrespective of its real relevance, need or value to your business. And I say that from many years of experience of quangos trying to \(miss-)sell me products on their terms, not mine as a purchaser.
No doubt the Proskills Printing Industry Board will be told about this latest initiative when it meets in a couple of weeks time, and we may well endorse and support it, but it's not 'employer led' when these things are rolled out first and reported to the industry's employers second.
<i>p.s. The Business Improvement Techniques NVQs are effectively owned and controlled by SEMTA \(another Sector Skills Council) and generate an income for it. If SEMTA was in the Financial Services sector, it would be obliged by law to tell you that it benefited financially from your purchase before it sold you the product.</i>